VRCWiki talk:Notability - Revision history

Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509: /* Notability for groups. */ Reply

2025-08-03T08:14:24Z

Notability for groups.: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 3 August 2025
Line 35:		Line 35:
	::::::::::Me, Hackebein, DAG-XR, and Pausbe~ are all Maintainers on the wiki, we are volunteer moderators.		::::::::::Me, Hackebein, DAG-XR, and Pausbe~ are all Maintainers on the wiki, we are volunteer moderators.
	::::::::::We've had some internal discussions (and brought them onto the talk page here for public discussion). I'll poke some of the others in this discussion to continue. [[User:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|<span style="color:#9966ff;">TrixxedHeart</span> <span style="font-size:6px; position: relative; top: -1em;">(They/Them)</span>]] ([[User Talk:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|talk]]) 19:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)		::::::::::We've had some internal discussions (and brought them onto the talk page here for public discussion). I'll poke some of the others in this discussion to continue. [[User:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|<span style="color:#9966ff;">TrixxedHeart</span> <span style="font-size:6px; position: relative; top: -1em;">(They/Them)</span>]] ([[User Talk:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|talk]]) 19:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
			:::::::::::As sevreal months have passed, I would like to know if any thought or consideration has been done over processing/creating the guidelines/policy for groups, If there is none please still let me know. [[User:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509]] ([[User talk:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|talk]]) 08:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

	== Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) ==		== Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) ==

Usr c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd: /* Notability for groups. */ Reply

2025-04-27T19:39:49Z

Notability for groups.: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 27 April 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:::::::::I would also like an overall review of notability completely, not explict to groups, Looking at a general notability review as the Wiki is a place of information and it feels slightly unfair for certain restrictions to be in place, It would be helpful/Reassuring knowing where the stand lays for the wiki admins(?).		:::::::::I would also like an overall review of notability completely, not explict to groups, Looking at a general notability review as the Wiki is a place of information and it feels slightly unfair for certain restrictions to be in place, It would be helpful/Reassuring knowing where the stand lays for the wiki admins(?).
	:::::::::I belive this should be a place of public information, and Should be imposing much less restrictions, things like keeping "meme" groups or worlds to a seperate section (of their own, Such as Community:Verified group is a Great example to demonstraght things already exisiting, I belive it would help control sporatic content. [[User:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509]] ([[User talk:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|talk]]) 09:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)		:::::::::I belive this should be a place of public information, and Should be imposing much less restrictions, things like keeping "meme" groups or worlds to a seperate section (of their own, Such as Community:Verified group is a Great example to demonstraght things already exisiting, I belive it would help control sporatic content. [[User:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509]] ([[User talk:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|talk]]) 09:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
			::::::::::<small>"Hey I see your name is purple, Which I can only assume you have high authoirty in what can/cannot be said, Could you also have feedback for the Proposal: Notability revision (April2025)?"</small>
			::::::::::Any user is able to customize their signature in their User Preferences page. It is not indicative of their actual authoritative position on the wiki.
			::::::::::Me, Hackebein, DAG-XR, and Pausbe~ are all Maintainers on the wiki, we are volunteer moderators.
			::::::::::We've had some internal discussions (and brought them onto the talk page here for public discussion). I'll poke some of the others in this discussion to continue. [[User:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|<span style="color:#9966ff;">TrixxedHeart</span> <span style="font-size:6px; position: relative; top: -1em;">(They/Them)</span>]] ([[User Talk:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|talk]]) 19:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

	== Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) ==		== Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) ==

Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee at 21:23, 21 April 2025

2025-04-21T21:23:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 21 April 2025
Line 59:		Line 59:
	::There are plenty of reasons not to trust the release system. That's why Community Labs exist, and even then questionable stuff will still slip out into the public. The reason the visits and favourites are considered is that it's an objective way to measure notability. I agree with you that more content should be on the wiki, but policies like this exists because you want more of '''notable quality''', have you scrolled down the "New" world row? Quality over quantity.		::There are plenty of reasons not to trust the release system. That's why Community Labs exist, and even then questionable stuff will still slip out into the public. The reason the visits and favourites are considered is that it's an objective way to measure notability. I agree with you that more content should be on the wiki, but policies like this exists because you want more of '''notable quality''', have you scrolled down the "New" world row? Quality over quantity.
	::VRChat is going to expand the Creator Economy to the public, we should not be playing catch-up when VRChat eventually does. You're correct that the creators that applied are "privileged", but the worlds are not "privileged". There is no review process for udon products that you add in your world. Also, the creators that applied had to meet VRChat's engagement (notablity) criteria. If it exists for that, why shouldn't exist on the wiki. [[User:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714]] ([[User talk:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)		::VRChat is going to expand the Creator Economy to the public, we should not be playing catch-up when VRChat eventually does. You're correct that the creators that applied are "privileged", but the worlds are not "privileged". There is no review process for udon products that you add in your world. Also, the creators that applied had to meet VRChat's engagement (notablity) criteria. If it exists for that, why shouldn't exist on the wiki. [[User:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714]] ([[User talk:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
	:::There are plenty of reasons not to trust the release system. That's why Community Labs exist, and even then questionable stuff will still slip out into the public. The reason the visits and favourites are considered is that it's an objective way to measure notability. I agree with you that more content should be on the wiki, but policies like this exists because you want more of notable quality, have you scrolled down the "New" world row? Quality over quantity.		:::> There are plenty of reasons not to trust the release system. That's why Community Labs exist, and even then questionable stuff will still slip out into the public. The reason the visits and favourites are considered is that it's an objective way to measure notability. I agree with you that more content should be on the wiki, but policies like this exists because you want more of notable quality, have you scrolled down the "New" world row? Quality over quantity.
	:::Community Labs is part of the release system for me. Numbers in favorites and visits show interest but not quality. We shouldn't decide on how the world performs. We should decide if there is content and if the content is quality enough for the wiki or not.		:::Community Labs is part of the release system for me. Numbers in favorites and visits show interest but not quality. We shouldn't decide on how the world performs. We should decide if there is content and if the content is quality enough for the wiki or not.
	:::An example of a world (created 2022) i would like to see on the wiki, which is with 480/16 far away from 10k/1k visits/favorites but is notable for me, do to it's feature to show VRChat wiki and navigate between the pages: https://vrchat.com/home/world/wrld_dae2a417-ab85-4dde-96ca-5f0d0ff73a62		:::An example of a world (created 2022) i would like to see on the wiki, which is with 480/16 far away from 10k/1k visits/favorites but is notable for me, do to it's feature to show VRChat wiki and navigate between the pages: https://vrchat.com/home/world/wrld_dae2a417-ab85-4dde-96ca-5f0d0ff73a62

Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee: /* Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) */ Reply

2025-04-21T21:22:14Z

Proposal: Notability revision (April2025): Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 21 April 2025
Line 59:		Line 59:
	::There are plenty of reasons not to trust the release system. That's why Community Labs exist, and even then questionable stuff will still slip out into the public. The reason the visits and favourites are considered is that it's an objective way to measure notability. I agree with you that more content should be on the wiki, but policies like this exists because you want more of '''notable quality''', have you scrolled down the "New" world row? Quality over quantity.		::There are plenty of reasons not to trust the release system. That's why Community Labs exist, and even then questionable stuff will still slip out into the public. The reason the visits and favourites are considered is that it's an objective way to measure notability. I agree with you that more content should be on the wiki, but policies like this exists because you want more of '''notable quality''', have you scrolled down the "New" world row? Quality over quantity.
	::VRChat is going to expand the Creator Economy to the public, we should not be playing catch-up when VRChat eventually does. You're correct that the creators that applied are "privileged", but the worlds are not "privileged". There is no review process for udon products that you add in your world. Also, the creators that applied had to meet VRChat's engagement (notablity) criteria. If it exists for that, why shouldn't exist on the wiki. [[User:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714]] ([[User talk:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)		::VRChat is going to expand the Creator Economy to the public, we should not be playing catch-up when VRChat eventually does. You're correct that the creators that applied are "privileged", but the worlds are not "privileged". There is no review process for udon products that you add in your world. Also, the creators that applied had to meet VRChat's engagement (notablity) criteria. If it exists for that, why shouldn't exist on the wiki. [[User:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714]] ([[User talk:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
			:::There are plenty of reasons not to trust the release system. That's why Community Labs exist, and even then questionable stuff will still slip out into the public. The reason the visits and favourites are considered is that it's an objective way to measure notability. I agree with you that more content should be on the wiki, but policies like this exists because you want more of notable quality, have you scrolled down the "New" world row? Quality over quantity.
			:::Community Labs is part of the release system for me. Numbers in favorites and visits show interest but not quality. We shouldn't decide on how the world performs. We should decide if there is content and if the content is quality enough for the wiki or not.
			:::An example of a world (created 2022) i would like to see on the wiki, which is with 480/16 far away from 10k/1k visits/favorites but is notable for me, do to it's feature to show VRChat wiki and navigate between the pages: https://vrchat.com/home/world/wrld_dae2a417-ab85-4dde-96ca-5f0d0ff73a62
			:::> VRChat is going to expand the Creator Economy to the public, we should not be playing catch-up when VRChat eventually does.
			:::I agree, after it's out for the public we shoudn't allow all CE worlds on the wiki anymore. They should then fall under the same criteria like non-ce worlds. [[User:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee]] ([[User talk:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|talk]]) 21:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
	:I notice on the Draft there is still no direct mention of "groups", My personal belive is there should be a Clear definition of groups, Otherwise it could lead to users creating pages anyway and well, Yeah, You get pages which doesn't fit the notability catagory because It wasn't written.		:I notice on the Draft there is still no direct mention of "groups", My personal belive is there should be a Clear definition of groups, Otherwise it could lead to users creating pages anyway and well, Yeah, You get pages which doesn't fit the notability catagory because It wasn't written.
	:My personal say on group notability should go as follows		:My personal say on group notability should go as follows

Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509: /* Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) */ Reply

2025-04-18T19:27:37Z

Proposal: Notability revision (April2025): Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 18 April 2025
Line 75:		Line 75:
	::The reason why Groups is not in the draft because the draft was made before this discussion topic.		::The reason why Groups is not in the draft because the draft was made before this discussion topic.
	::I pretty much agree with you, minus the creator economy exception (for reasons listed in the above). The 500 member exception, I'm a bit iffy on. Not the biggest fan of "exceptions" it should be clear without variables. [[User:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714]] ([[User talk:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|talk]]) 03:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)		::I pretty much agree with you, minus the creator economy exception (for reasons listed in the above). The 500 member exception, I'm a bit iffy on. Not the biggest fan of "exceptions" it should be clear without variables. [[User:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714]] ([[User talk:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|talk]]) 03:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
			:::Variables allow user diversity and content diversity, There are lots of pro-active commmunitys and I would say 500 members being the floor for simplisty then. [[User:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509]] ([[User talk:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|talk]]) 19:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509: /* Notability for groups. */ correcting page name

2025-04-18T09:38:55Z

Notability for groups.: correcting page name

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:38, 18 April 2025
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:::::::::Hey I see your name is purple, Which I can only assume you have high authoirty in what can/cannot be said, Could you also have feedback for the Proposal: Notability revision (April2025)?		:::::::::Hey I see your name is purple, Which I can only assume you have high authoirty in what can/cannot be said, Could you also have feedback for the Proposal: Notability revision (April2025)?
	:::::::::I would also like an overall review of notability completely, not explict to groups, Looking at a general notability review as the Wiki is a place of information and it feels slightly unfair for certain restrictions to be in place, It would be helpful/Reassuring knowing where the stand lays for the wiki admins(?).		:::::::::I would also like an overall review of notability completely, not explict to groups, Looking at a general notability review as the Wiki is a place of information and it feels slightly unfair for certain restrictions to be in place, It would be helpful/Reassuring knowing where the stand lays for the wiki admins(?).
	:::::::::I belive this should be a place of public information, and Should be imposing much less restrictions, things like keeping "meme" groups or worlds to a seperate section (of their own, Such as Community:Verified ~~Groups~~ is a Great example to demonstraght things already exisiting, I belive it would help control sporatic content. [[User:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509]] ([[User talk:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|talk]]) 09:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)		:::::::::I belive this should be a place of public information, and Should be imposing much less restrictions, things like keeping "meme" groups or worlds to a seperate section (of their own, Such as Community:Verified group is a Great example to demonstraght things already exisiting, I belive it would help control sporatic content. [[User:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509]] ([[User talk:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|talk]]) 09:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

	== Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) ==		== Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) ==

Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509: /* Notability for groups. */ Reply

2025-04-18T09:36:50Z

Notability for groups.: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:36, 18 April 2025
Line 28:		Line 28:
	::::::::It would likely be better to just have it community namespace, we are considering making more individual namespaces for things such as worlds, groups, and so on.		::::::::It would likely be better to just have it community namespace, we are considering making more individual namespaces for things such as worlds, groups, and so on.
	::::::::Overall I agree with the assessment that ideally groups that are moreso communities (or otherwise offer large events such as Ministry) are what should qualify most. [[User:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|<span style="color:#9966ff;">TrixxedHeart</span> <span style="font-size:6px; position: relative; top: -1em;">(They/Them)</span>]] ([[User Talk:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|talk]]) 17:30, 16 April 2025 (UTC)		::::::::Overall I agree with the assessment that ideally groups that are moreso communities (or otherwise offer large events such as Ministry) are what should qualify most. [[User:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|<span style="color:#9966ff;">TrixxedHeart</span> <span style="font-size:6px; position: relative; top: -1em;">(They/Them)</span>]] ([[User Talk:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|talk]]) 17:30, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
			:::::::::Hey I see your name is purple, Which I can only assume you have high authoirty in what can/cannot be said, Could you also have feedback for the Proposal: Notability revision (April2025)?
			:::::::::I would also like an overall review of notability completely, not explict to groups, Looking at a general notability review as the Wiki is a place of information and it feels slightly unfair for certain restrictions to be in place, It would be helpful/Reassuring knowing where the stand lays for the wiki admins(?).
			:::::::::I belive this should be a place of public information, and Should be imposing much less restrictions, things like keeping "meme" groups or worlds to a seperate section (of their own, Such as Community:Verified Groups is a Great example to demonstraght things already exisiting, I belive it would help control sporatic content. [[User:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509]] ([[User talk:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|talk]]) 09:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

	== Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) ==		== Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) ==

Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714: /* Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) */ Reply

2025-04-17T03:12:22Z

Proposal: Notability revision (April2025): Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 17 April 2025
Line 70:		Line 70:
	::In short this means with above 1000 group members, can always create a group page. Or above 500 group member, if the group has any public visible announcement? [[User:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee]] ([[User talk:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|talk]]) 17:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)		::In short this means with above 1000 group members, can always create a group page. Or above 500 group member, if the group has any public visible announcement? [[User:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee]] ([[User talk:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|talk]]) 17:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
	:::Persistent visable, Looking at [https://vrc.group/DOENER.7097 VRC Dönertreff] is a Perfect example of a sub 1,000 group with active community engagement looking to cause users to congreate and enjoy music together. [[User:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509]] ([[User talk:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|talk]]) 17:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)		:::Persistent visable, Looking at [https://vrc.group/DOENER.7097 VRC Dönertreff] is a Perfect example of a sub 1,000 group with active community engagement looking to cause users to congreate and enjoy music together. [[User:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509]] ([[User talk:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|talk]]) 17:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
			::The reason why Groups is not in the draft because the draft was made before this discussion topic.
			::I pretty much agree with you, minus the creator economy exception (for reasons listed in the above). The 500 member exception, I'm a bit iffy on. Not the biggest fan of "exceptions" it should be clear without variables. [[User:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714]] ([[User talk:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|talk]]) 03:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714: /* Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) */ Reply

2025-04-17T02:59:50Z

Proposal: Notability revision (April2025): Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:59, 17 April 2025
Line 54:		Line 54:
	:<s>**have at least 10,000 visits or 1,000 favorites.</s>		:<s>**have at least 10,000 visits or 1,000 favorites.</s>
	:On top of that i would like to include all Creator Econemy Worlds. These Worlds and Creators got previledged and are hand selected by VRChat. [[User:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee]] ([[User talk:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|talk]]) 11:50, 16 April 2025 (UTC)		:On top of that i would like to include all Creator Econemy Worlds. These Worlds and Creators got previledged and are hand selected by VRChat. [[User:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee]] ([[User talk:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|talk]]) 11:50, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
			::There are plenty of reasons not to trust the release system. That's why Community Labs exist, and even then questionable stuff will still slip out into the public. The reason the visits and favourites are considered is that it's an objective way to measure notability. I agree with you that more content should be on the wiki, but policies like this exists because you want more of '''notable quality''', have you scrolled down the "New" world row? Quality over quantity.
			::VRChat is going to expand the Creator Economy to the public, we should not be playing catch-up when VRChat eventually does. You're correct that the creators that applied are "privileged", but the worlds are not "privileged". There is no review process for udon products that you add in your world. Also, the creators that applied had to meet VRChat's engagement (notablity) criteria. If it exists for that, why shouldn't exist on the wiki. [[User:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714]] ([[User talk:Usr c0fd3826-5fbd-465b-869b-142f974af714\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
	:I notice on the Draft there is still no direct mention of "groups", My personal belive is there should be a Clear definition of groups, Otherwise it could lead to users creating pages anyway and well, Yeah, You get pages which doesn't fit the notability catagory because It wasn't written.		:I notice on the Draft there is still no direct mention of "groups", My personal belive is there should be a Clear definition of groups, Otherwise it could lead to users creating pages anyway and well, Yeah, You get pages which doesn't fit the notability catagory because It wasn't written.
	:My personal say on group notability should go as follows		:My personal say on group notability should go as follows

Usr c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd: /* Notability for groups. */ Reply

2025-04-16T17:30:52Z

Notability for groups.: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 16 April 2025
Line 25:		Line 25:
	::::::Their for having a extra namespace won't be harmful, and if we Don't do it now, '''Imagine in the future''' when we want to move all these groups to another namespace, Thats '''alot''' of manual labour that could be avoided by being efficent now! [[User:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509]] ([[User talk:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|talk]]) 16:25, 16 April 2025 (UTC)		::::::Their for having a extra namespace won't be harmful, and if we Don't do it now, '''Imagine in the future''' when we want to move all these groups to another namespace, Thats '''alot''' of manual labour that could be avoided by being efficent now! [[User:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509]] ([[User talk:Usr 1a5319fb-f3a7-4ee9-8ed3-83c96116b509\|talk]]) 16:25, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
	:::::::I recommend to use "Community:Group:Offline" (Group instead of Groups) to align with namespace names [[User:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee]] ([[User talk:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|talk]]) 16:35, 16 April 2025 (UTC)		:::::::I recommend to use "Community:Group:Offline" (Group instead of Groups) to align with namespace names [[User:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee]] ([[User talk:Usr 40be82e7-f7d5-4548-b314-3fc7b26d22ee\|talk]]) 16:35, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
			::::::::I don't see any issue with this besides Community:Groups:abcd looking a little clunky.
			::::::::It would likely be better to just have it community namespace, we are considering making more individual namespaces for things such as worlds, groups, and so on.
			::::::::Overall I agree with the assessment that ideally groups that are moreso communities (or otherwise offer large events such as Ministry) are what should qualify most. [[User:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|<span style="color:#9966ff;">TrixxedHeart</span> <span style="font-size:6px; position: relative; top: -1em;">(They/Them)</span>]] ([[User Talk:Usr_c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd\|talk]]) 17:30, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

	== Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) ==		== Proposal: Notability revision (April2025) ==