VRCWiki:Neutral point of view/zh-hant: Difference between revisions
From VRChat Wiki
No edit summary |
Created page with "編輯者雖然自然會有自身的觀點，但應本著誠意來努力提供完整的資訊，而非偏袒或推崇某一特定觀點。不過所謂的中立，並不代表排除某些觀點，而是指應納入所有分量足夠且可經驗證的觀點。" |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
要達到 VRChat Wiki 社群所認可的「中立性」，意味著需謹慎且批判性地分析各種可靠來源，並嘗試以公平、適當且盡可能不帶編輯偏見的方式，將這些資料呈現給讀者。其目的是傳達資訊，而非影響觀點。 | 要達到 VRChat Wiki 社群所認可的「中立性」，意味著需謹慎且批判性地分析各種可靠來源，並嘗試以公平、適當且盡可能不帶編輯偏見的方式，將這些資料呈現給讀者。其目的是傳達資訊，而非影響觀點。 | ||
編輯者雖然自然會有自身的觀點，但應本著誠意來努力提供完整的資訊，而非偏袒或推崇某一特定觀點。不過所謂的中立，並不代表排除某些觀點，而是指應納入所有分量足夠且可經驗證的觀點。 | |||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> | <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> | ||
* '''Avoid stating opinions as facts.''' Articles should contain information about significant opinions expressed about their subjects. However, these opinions should not be stated in the VRChat Wiki's voice. Instead, they should be attributed in the text to particular sources or, where justified, described as widespread views. For example, an article should not state that a VRChat world is the best but may state that a particular user has described it as highly popular. | * '''Avoid stating opinions as facts.''' Articles should contain information about significant opinions expressed about their subjects. However, these opinions should not be stated in the VRChat Wiki's voice. Instead, they should be attributed in the text to particular sources or, where justified, described as widespread views. For example, an article should not state that a VRChat world is the best but may state that a particular user has described it as highly popular. | ||
Revision as of 05:08, 30 May 2025
VRChat Wiki 上的所有內容都必須以「中立的觀點」（NPOV, Neutral Point of View）為基礎進行撰寫，因此在編纂條目時，應盡可能公平、適當地呈現各種重要觀點，並避免編輯者個人偏見，同時以可靠來源所發表的觀點為依據。
中立觀點是 VRChat Wiki 的基本原則，也是判斷一篇文章中內容類型與品質是否合格的重要依據。
定義
要達到 VRChat Wiki 社群所認可的「中立性」，意味著需謹慎且批判性地分析各種可靠來源，並嘗試以公平、適當且盡可能不帶編輯偏見的方式，將這些資料呈現給讀者。其目的是傳達資訊，而非影響觀點。
編輯者雖然自然會有自身的觀點，但應本著誠意來努力提供完整的資訊，而非偏袒或推崇某一特定觀點。不過所謂的中立，並不代表排除某些觀點，而是指應納入所有分量足夠且可經驗證的觀點。
- Avoid stating opinions as facts. Articles should contain information about significant opinions expressed about their subjects. However, these opinions should not be stated in the VRChat Wiki's voice. Instead, they should be attributed in the text to particular sources or, where justified, described as widespread views. For example, an article should not state that a VRChat world is the best but may state that a particular user has described it as highly popular.
- Avoid stating seriously contested assertions as facts. If different reliable sources make conflicting assertions about a matter, treat these assertions as opinions rather than facts, and do not present them as direct statements.
- Prefer nonjudgmental language. A neutral point of view neither sympathizes with nor disparages its subject (or what reliable sources say about the subject), although this must sometimes be balanced against clarity.
Remember, the goal of the VRChat Wiki is to provide accurate, verifiable, and unbiased information about VRChat and its community. Flexibility is allowed, but all content should be as neutral and informative as possible.
