User:Usr c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd/proposal

From VRChat Wiki
< User:Usr c272d4fe-f1f8-4d77-8008-cad6cb81d6cd
Revision as of 19:42, 25 October 2024 by TrixxedHeart (talk | contribs) (Policy proposal draft)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
CautionTriangle.png
Notice
This is a proposal for a policy to be implemented and is not currently active. It is actively being discussed by maintainers to improve and vote upon it.


Armchair moderation

Sometimes known as "Mini-modding"
Armchair moderating is the act of engaging in moderator-like behavior while not holding a moderative position, such as maintainer or organizer. This behavior can cause confusion and friction between users, as it undermines the roles of maintainers and could lead to the spread of incorrect information. To ensure no user gets confused and a respectful constructive environment is maintained, it is important to recognize the boundaries between being a helpful contributor and performing unofficial moderative actions.

Examples of Armchair moderation

Some actions that constitute armchair moderation include:

  • Interpreting or enforcing policy: Telling other users what they can or cannot do, or warning them about potential violations without holding a moderative role.
  • Directing others where to post content or how to edit: Instructing users to make posts in specific places, or how to structure their contributions based on personal interpretation of policies. If you believe something is done incorrectly, please ask a maintainer to review and handle it.
  • Giving unsolicited warnings or reprimands: Criticizing other users for their actions or edits as if issuing an official warning.
  • Interfering with Active Moderation: Providing unsolicited instructions, advice, or commentary on how to handle a situation that a maintainer is already addressing. This can disrupt the process, cause confusion, and undermine the authority of the maintainer.
    • Please keep in mind that maintainers collectively discuss how to handle a situation privately to ensure that the actions being taken are appropriate and are within policy. There are very few cases where action is being taken that is not done without the input of other maintainers.

What to do instead

If you encounter behavior that you believe violates wiki policy or guidelines, please take the following steps:

  • Report the issue: Utilize communication channels to contact a maintainer to bring the issue to their attention.
  • Clarify policy through discussion: If a user seems unaware of a policy, frame your response as a suggestion or reference rather than an order. Use language that encourages constructive non-accusatory language, such as:
    • "I think the guidelines suggests doing [XYZ]."
    • "If you're unsure, you might want to check out [link to policy]."
    • "@[Active Maintainer], can we have clarification on this?"
  • Focus on collaboration, not enforcement: Assume good faith and offer friendly advice rather than directives. Remember, it's okay to guide other editors, but it's not your responsibility to enforce the rules unless you hold a maintainer position.

Why armchair moderation is discouraged

  • It creates confusion: Users may receive mixed messages if multiple people attempt to interpret and enforce rules differently.
  • It undermines moderators: Maintainers are responsible for ensuring that users follow the guidelines and policy. Bypassing their authority can lead to conflicts and misunderstandings.
  • It discourages participation: Harsh or unsolicited enforcement from non-maintainers may intimidate new or inexperienced contributors, discouraging them from continuing to engage.